Review of Historical Archaeology of Tucumán: case studies and new contributions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55695/rdahayl19.02.03Keywords:
Review, Historical Archaeology, TucumanAbstract
Historical Archaeology of Tucumán: Case Studies and New Contributions (2024) is consolidated as the first work to compile, summarize, and explore the diversity of works on historical archaeology in the province of Tucumán, Argentina. Edited by Florencia Borsella and Alexis Weber, prominent professionals in the field and authors of two chapters, this illustrated volume offers a broad and contextualized look at how archaeological research can contribute to our understanding of colonial and recent history in Tucumán, with great potential to explore and link the findings with other sites in Argentina and Latin America.
Downloads
References
Borsella, F., & Weber, A. (Comps.). (2024). Arqueología histórica de Tucumán: estudio de casos y nuevos aportes. Ediciones Academia.
Granillo, A. (1872). Provincia de Tucumán: Serie de artículos descriptivos y noticiosos mandados publicar
por S. E. el Sr. Gobernador D. Federico Helguera. Imprenta de La Razón.
Lorandi, A. M. (1988). El servicio personal como agente de desestructuración en el Tucumán colonial. Revista Andina, 15(1), 135–173.
Noli, E. (2012). Indios ladinos, criollos aindiados. Procesos de mestizaje y memoria étnica en Tucumán, (siglo XVII). Editorial Prohistoria.
Schávelzon, D. (2024). Prólogo. En F. Borsella & A. Weber (Comps.), Arqueología histórica de Tucumán: estudio de casos y nuevos aportes (pp. 11–17). Ediciones Academia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
In order to avoid plagiarism and self-plagiarism, a document signed by the authors must be sent, together with the manuscript and supplementary material, guaranteeing the originality and unpublished character of the manuscript. All the received manuscripts and evaluations information are confidential, and the Editorial Committee undertakes not to reveal it to anyone other than those involved in the evaluation process, according to the double-blind modality.
